Willis O'Brien
Willis O'Brien is an American editor who was born on the 2nd March 1886 in Oakland, California, USA. He started his work in Hollywood as a animator for films but his big break did not come until 1933, where he probably did his best work. O'Brien did the special effects work on the set of King Kong. At the time this type of technical brilliance has never been seen before. In the years after Kong O'Brien only other notable piece of work was chief animator on the set of Mighty Joe Young. In 1950 his work was finally recognized as he won an Oscar for best animator, this as well as his work on the set of King Kong was considered among the best of his achievements.
Ray Harryhausen,
Born in Los Angeles, the main event in his early life was when he saw King Kong in 1933. He was so amazed that the then 13-year-old Harryhausen that he began researching the film's effects work, ultimately learning all he could about Willis H. O'Brien and stop-motion photography. However he wouldn't actually work with the famous animator until 1949 where he was on the set of Mighty Joe young, Although O'Brien received credit for it, it was reported that Harryhausen did 85% of the actual animation. Harryhausen usually worked alone on his films, so this would reportedly take a long time to do. The most famous example was probably his best work, Jason and the Argonauts which took the animator 2 years to do, he reportedly sot 13 frames a day, that's about a second a day.
Jan Švankmajer
There was nothing to tell in Jan early life apart from that he graduated from the Prague Academy of Fine Arts in the 1950s, Jan Svankmajer then began working as a theatre director, chiefly in association with the Theatre of Masks and the Black Theatre. He first experimented with film-making after becoming involved with the mixed-media productions of Prague's Lanterna Magika Theatre. He began making short films in 1964, and continued working in the same medium for over twenty years, when he finally achieved his long-held ambition to make a feature film based on Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland.
Unit 33 Stop Motion Animation Production
Assignment 1: Understand the techniques and development of stop motion animation
Wednesday, 19 July 2017
Thursday, 13 July 2017
Eadweard Muybridge and Edison
Origin of film
Before we look at Eadweard Muybridge and Thomas Edisons work we must look at other important stages in their line of work. The first thing to take note is that early film is a result of inventors, not artists. inventors sold their ideas to toy makers, they used this theory to create hand help machines to sell to children this was the foundations of film development. some important dates to recognize before we look at Muybridge and Edisons work are:
Thomas Edison
Born on February 11, 1847, in Milan, Ohio,
Before we look at Eadweard Muybridge and Thomas Edisons work we must look at other important stages in their line of work. The first thing to take note is that early film is a result of inventors, not artists. inventors sold their ideas to toy makers, they used this theory to create hand help machines to sell to children this was the foundations of film development. some important dates to recognize before we look at Muybridge and Edisons work are:
- 1816 - Nicephore Niepce made the first photographic image.
- 1839 - Over 2 decades later Louis Daguerre created clear, sharp images on silver copperplate, it required 15 minutes exposure time.
- 1848 - George Eastman developed celluloid film originally created for the still camera, it made motion pictures possible. its flexibility allowed light to pass through for exposure
- 1882 - Etienne-Jules Marey invents photographic gun, lens in the muzzle paper in the chamber oull trigger and 12 rapid exposures and then eventually 100.
Eadweard Muybridge
Eadweard Muggerbridge was born on April 9 1830, in Kingston upon Thames, England. At the age of 20 Eadweard immegrated to America and more specifically San Francisco, this is about the same time he changed his last name to Muybridge as he believed this was its original construction. Muybridge always had a reputation for being a photographer even after his stage coach accident which left him with double vision and headaches. In the late 1800s California Governor Leland Stanford sought Muybridge out to help settle a bet. During this time, speculation had raged for years over whether all four hooves of a running horse left the ground at the same time. Stanford believed they did, but the motion was too fast for the human eye to detect. this led to Muybridge to consruct a experiment. In 1872 Muybridge set up 12 cameras along a track, tied strings to the shutters which were tripped as the horse ran down the track. His findings supported Stanfords idea but the gab between the shutters left it inconclusive. With futher finding from Stanford however Muybridge was able to construct a move complicated construction which backed his theory, that horses at some points have all four hooves of the ground. Near the end of his life, he published several books showing his motion photographs when he toured Europe and Africa. He presented his photographic findings using a projection device he'd developed called the Zoopraxiscope. Muybridge died from prostate Cancer in 1903 in his hometown of Kingston Upon Thames. His worked inspired the likes Thomas Edison and Etienne-Jules Marey. Muybridge's innovative camera techniques enabled people to see things otherwise too fast to comprehend and people still admire his work to this day.
Thomas Edison
Born on February 11, 1847, in Milan, Ohio,
Wednesday, 28 June 2017
Emile Reynaud (Praxinoscope)
What is it and how does it work?
The praxinoscope was an animation device which created an illusion of movement, it was the successor to the zoetrope. It worked similar to the zoetrope as it was on a cylinder but it had an inner rotation of mirrors which projected the images of that.
Who invented it and when.
According to Wikipedia the praxinoscope was inveted in France in 1877 by French inventor Charles-Emile Reynaud after he soent many years trying to improve on the zoetrope.
How this was better than the zoetrope.
The reason why the praxinoscope is better that the zoetrope as it includes an inner rotation of mirrors so when projected looking in the mirror would see a brighter and less distorted picture that the zoetrope offered with its normal pictures.
How it was developed into the “Theatre Optique”
In 1889 Reynaud developed the Théâtre Optique, an improved version capable of projecting images on a screen from a longer roll of pictures. This allowed him to show hand-drawn animated cartoons to larger audiences. However it was soon taken over in popularity by the photographic film projector of the Lumiere brothers
The praxinoscope was an animation device which created an illusion of movement, it was the successor to the zoetrope. It worked similar to the zoetrope as it was on a cylinder but it had an inner rotation of mirrors which projected the images of that.
Who invented it and when.
According to Wikipedia the praxinoscope was inveted in France in 1877 by French inventor Charles-Emile Reynaud after he soent many years trying to improve on the zoetrope.
How this was better than the zoetrope.
The reason why the praxinoscope is better that the zoetrope as it includes an inner rotation of mirrors so when projected looking in the mirror would see a brighter and less distorted picture that the zoetrope offered with its normal pictures.
How it was developed into the “Theatre Optique”
In 1889 Reynaud developed the Théâtre Optique, an improved version capable of projecting images on a screen from a longer roll of pictures. This allowed him to show hand-drawn animated cartoons to larger audiences. However it was soon taken over in popularity by the photographic film projector of the Lumiere brothers
Friday, 26 May 2017
William Horner (Zoetrope)
What is it and how does it work?
A zoetrope is one of several pre-film animation devises that produce the illusion of movement by displaying a sequence of drawings and photographs. The zoetrope worked by having a set of images inside a cylinder and the viewer would look through the gap in the cylinder when it is moving, doing this blurred the images together and created an illusion of movement.
Who invented it and when?
According to Wikipedia the idea was first explored in July 1833 by Simon Stampfer as in his pamphlet about his invention the phenakistiscope, he mentioned an idea which had the images in a cylinder as well but he chose to have it in a disc. However the definitive zoetrope was invented by William Ensign Lincoln in 1865 when he was 18 years old and a sophomore at Brown University in Rhode Island.
how was this better than the phenakistoscope?
This was better than its predecessor the phenakistoscope as it had to be used with an mirror and it could only be used by one person at a time. Whereas the zoetrope got rid of the mirror and the multiple gabs meant it could be viewed by more than one person it was also more accessible to use as there was no mirror.
A zoetrope is one of several pre-film animation devises that produce the illusion of movement by displaying a sequence of drawings and photographs. The zoetrope worked by having a set of images inside a cylinder and the viewer would look through the gap in the cylinder when it is moving, doing this blurred the images together and created an illusion of movement.
Who invented it and when?
According to Wikipedia the idea was first explored in July 1833 by Simon Stampfer as in his pamphlet about his invention the phenakistiscope, he mentioned an idea which had the images in a cylinder as well but he chose to have it in a disc. However the definitive zoetrope was invented by William Ensign Lincoln in 1865 when he was 18 years old and a sophomore at Brown University in Rhode Island.
how was this better than the phenakistoscope?
This was better than its predecessor the phenakistoscope as it had to be used with an mirror and it could only be used by one person at a time. Whereas the zoetrope got rid of the mirror and the multiple gabs meant it could be viewed by more than one person it was also more accessible to use as there was no mirror.
Thursday, 25 May 2017
Joseph Plateau (Phenakiscope)
What is it and how does it work?
The phenakiscope was the first well known worldwide device that created an illusion of movement. It is regarded as one of the first forms of viewing media and it paved the way for the motion picture and film industry. The phenakiscope usually comes in the form of two circular cards them attached together with a gap on the top card which had a similar image to the top card. When spun the gap would blur the two images together creating an illusion of movement. The problem with the phenakiscope compared to its successors is that it can only be viewed by one person at a time.
Who invented it and when.
According to the Wikipedia page on Google, the phenakiscope was invented simultanesly around December 1832 by Belgian physicist Joseph Plateau and by the Austrian professor of practical geometry Simon Stampfer.
What was the difference between the two types?
The phenakiscope without the mirror worked on the idea that you place two discs on either side of a brass axis, this allegedly led to clearer images bit is slightly more unwieldy. Future inventions also led to one where two people could view it at the same time.
The phenakiscope was the first well known worldwide device that created an illusion of movement. It is regarded as one of the first forms of viewing media and it paved the way for the motion picture and film industry. The phenakiscope usually comes in the form of two circular cards them attached together with a gap on the top card which had a similar image to the top card. When spun the gap would blur the two images together creating an illusion of movement. The problem with the phenakiscope compared to its successors is that it can only be viewed by one person at a time.
Who invented it and when.
According to the Wikipedia page on Google, the phenakiscope was invented simultanesly around December 1832 by Belgian physicist Joseph Plateau and by the Austrian professor of practical geometry Simon Stampfer.
What was the difference between the two types?
The phenakiscope without the mirror worked on the idea that you place two discs on either side of a brass axis, this allegedly led to clearer images bit is slightly more unwieldy. Future inventions also led to one where two people could view it at the same time.
Thursday, 11 May 2017
History of Frame Rates
What is the Phi Phenomenon?
The Phi Phenomenon was first discovered by Max Whertheimer in 1912. The basis of the theory is that since the human brain can perceive 10-12 individual images per second so the anything faster than this then are mind bends the images together giving us the illusion that the image is moving.
What is the significance of 12fps?
The significance is as this is the maximum frames a human eye can take in per second, so to achieve the illusion of movement then the images need to be faster than this, anything less than this then we would notice and the image will stop blending together. This was the fist frame rate, however with film there is still a flicker.
Undercrank Vs. Overcrank.
In the time before you had mechanical projectors which projected the film you had to do it by hand. The problem of this is because the frame rate was controlled by the person manually cranking the film, you had two issues with this they were undercranking and overcranking. They are:
What impact did the introduction of sound have on frame rate?
The introduction of sound into film was one of the most drastic changes in cinema history, the sound was recorded separately and run beside the picture. This meant that the picture had to be very precise and accurate in order to run with sound, the frame rate to match this was 24 fps.
Why did 24 become the international frame rate standard?
With 48 projected frames being the goal, they settled for the next best thing, 24fps with a double bladed shutters which allowed the image to be seen 48 times a second. The reason why it was 24 was because it was easily divided by factors. For example, you know that 12 frames would be half a second, and a quarter would be six and a third would be 8. Another main factor was that the cost of film was expensive and 24 was the lowest number needed for sound to blend with picture.
What issues surrounded Bandwith?
The issue with bandwidth was that it was different to film but it still had the issue of flickering frames so the idea came from both German engineer Fritz Schroter and American engineer Richard Ballard in 1930 & 1932 respectively. There idea was to interlace the broadcast.
What is interlacing?
Interlacing is the idea of breaking up each frame into two sections, these were known as upper field and lower field. These were then broadcasted on TV in a comb like fashion which stop the flickering. However, the main issue was intermodulation. This is when there is almost like a wave going down your screen, this was caused by the electrical current generated from the TV. The US standard power rate was 60Hz, this equalled 60 fields per second, and this in frame rate equals 30fps.
How was the challenge of intermodulation tackled?
The problem with intermodulation was that a beat in the picture would create a wave which ran down the screen, to tackle this problem they set the refresh rate to that of the power of the TV. For example, in the United States this was 60Hz.
What was the significance of 60Hz and how does it relate to 30fps?
60Hz is the power generated from the average TV in the United States and this means you see 60 fields per second on your TV screen, this then results to the full 30fps and since this was over the standard of 24fps people were able to watch TV more clearly.
VHF Vs. UHF
In 1948 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) put a temporary ban on TV licenses as it tried to figure out what to do with the new UHF spectrum. This represented the bandwidth to run colour into TV, this was anything from 300-3000MHz. this different from the VHF system, this was simply what TV had already been running on and it was from 30-300MHz.
How was the colour standard arrived at?
The National Television System Committee (NTSC) and the RCA combined together to try solve the issue of finding a colour standard that was compatible with the old TV sets. They used a theory first used by George Valensi in 1938. Valensi idea was to break down the colour picture into luminance and chrominance, this meant that broadcasters could embed the colour as a sub carrier in the television signal. What this meant was that new colour TVs could pick up this signal and broadcast them where the older black and white TVs would jest ignore it. This meant that colour television and black and white television were separated.
What challenge did bandwidth present to achieving colour standard and how was this problem overcome?
The only problem with new coloured television’s was that the bandwidth used by the new TVs standard could potentially interfere with the audio signal creating a mismatch between picture and audio and create intermodal beating. This problem was solved by reducing the framerate by 0.1%, so that the two signals would never fully match up.
What was the fields per second ratio that was eventually developed as the standard in colour and what was the resulting frames per second ratio?
The fields from second went from 60 to 59.94 frames per second for the standard in colour. The resulting frames per second went from 30 to 29.97fps. This helped created a two separate signals for colour television and black and white television.
What is PAL and why was it developed?
PAL stands for Phase Alternating Line and this is the European equivalent of the NTSC and they were created in 1967 by the German Broadcasting Authorities. PAL was created as they wanted to solve the colour gradient problem that NTSC was having by using a 50Hz power outlet rather than the Americans 60Hz.
What are fields per secod and frames per second of PAL & SECAM?
Both PAL and SECAM both run at 50 fields per second which then converts to 25fps.
How we get from 24fps to 60i video stream.
How do modern Digital Cameras avoid the telecine progress and with what affect?
Modern digital cameras avoid the telecine progress altogether by recording 23.976fps directly on the hard drives, this was effective as you did not have to go down the 3:2 pull down method.
How are 24fps films telecine’d onto SECAM or PAL 25fps?
This process is much simpler than the 3:2 pulldown method as all you have to do is use a 2:2 pulldown. This means that you have to do is times the 24fps by 4% this results in the frames being translated onto an upper and a lower field. However the increase raises the pitch of the audio by a noticeable 0.679 semitones, this can be counteracted by a pitch shifter.
Explain High Frame rates and temporal resolution?
What are the issues with higher frame rates in narrative filmmaking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYjFEp9Yx0
The Phi Phenomenon was first discovered by Max Whertheimer in 1912. The basis of the theory is that since the human brain can perceive 10-12 individual images per second so the anything faster than this then are mind bends the images together giving us the illusion that the image is moving.
What is the significance of 12fps?
The significance is as this is the maximum frames a human eye can take in per second, so to achieve the illusion of movement then the images need to be faster than this, anything less than this then we would notice and the image will stop blending together. This was the fist frame rate, however with film there is still a flicker.
Undercrank Vs. Overcrank.
In the time before you had mechanical projectors which projected the film you had to do it by hand. The problem of this is because the frame rate was controlled by the person manually cranking the film, you had two issues with this they were undercranking and overcranking. They are:
- Undercrank: this is the process in the older days when you had to make the camera work by hand so this is when record a slower frame rate than the final projection.
- Overcrank: this is similar to under cranking but instead you are recording a faster frame rate than the final projection.
What impact did the introduction of sound have on frame rate?
The introduction of sound into film was one of the most drastic changes in cinema history, the sound was recorded separately and run beside the picture. This meant that the picture had to be very precise and accurate in order to run with sound, the frame rate to match this was 24 fps.
Why did 24 become the international frame rate standard?
With 48 projected frames being the goal, they settled for the next best thing, 24fps with a double bladed shutters which allowed the image to be seen 48 times a second. The reason why it was 24 was because it was easily divided by factors. For example, you know that 12 frames would be half a second, and a quarter would be six and a third would be 8. Another main factor was that the cost of film was expensive and 24 was the lowest number needed for sound to blend with picture.
What issues surrounded Bandwith?
The issue with bandwidth was that it was different to film but it still had the issue of flickering frames so the idea came from both German engineer Fritz Schroter and American engineer Richard Ballard in 1930 & 1932 respectively. There idea was to interlace the broadcast.
What is interlacing?
Interlacing is the idea of breaking up each frame into two sections, these were known as upper field and lower field. These were then broadcasted on TV in a comb like fashion which stop the flickering. However, the main issue was intermodulation. This is when there is almost like a wave going down your screen, this was caused by the electrical current generated from the TV. The US standard power rate was 60Hz, this equalled 60 fields per second, and this in frame rate equals 30fps.
How was the challenge of intermodulation tackled?
The problem with intermodulation was that a beat in the picture would create a wave which ran down the screen, to tackle this problem they set the refresh rate to that of the power of the TV. For example, in the United States this was 60Hz.
What was the significance of 60Hz and how does it relate to 30fps?
60Hz is the power generated from the average TV in the United States and this means you see 60 fields per second on your TV screen, this then results to the full 30fps and since this was over the standard of 24fps people were able to watch TV more clearly.
VHF Vs. UHF
In 1948 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) put a temporary ban on TV licenses as it tried to figure out what to do with the new UHF spectrum. This represented the bandwidth to run colour into TV, this was anything from 300-3000MHz. this different from the VHF system, this was simply what TV had already been running on and it was from 30-300MHz.
How was the colour standard arrived at?
The National Television System Committee (NTSC) and the RCA combined together to try solve the issue of finding a colour standard that was compatible with the old TV sets. They used a theory first used by George Valensi in 1938. Valensi idea was to break down the colour picture into luminance and chrominance, this meant that broadcasters could embed the colour as a sub carrier in the television signal. What this meant was that new colour TVs could pick up this signal and broadcast them where the older black and white TVs would jest ignore it. This meant that colour television and black and white television were separated.
What challenge did bandwidth present to achieving colour standard and how was this problem overcome?
The only problem with new coloured television’s was that the bandwidth used by the new TVs standard could potentially interfere with the audio signal creating a mismatch between picture and audio and create intermodal beating. This problem was solved by reducing the framerate by 0.1%, so that the two signals would never fully match up.
What was the fields per second ratio that was eventually developed as the standard in colour and what was the resulting frames per second ratio?
The fields from second went from 60 to 59.94 frames per second for the standard in colour. The resulting frames per second went from 30 to 29.97fps. This helped created a two separate signals for colour television and black and white television.
What is PAL and why was it developed?
PAL stands for Phase Alternating Line and this is the European equivalent of the NTSC and they were created in 1967 by the German Broadcasting Authorities. PAL was created as they wanted to solve the colour gradient problem that NTSC was having by using a 50Hz power outlet rather than the Americans 60Hz.
What are fields per secod and frames per second of PAL & SECAM?
Both PAL and SECAM both run at 50 fields per second which then converts to 25fps.
How we get from 24fps to 60i video stream.
- Firstly, the 24fps is slowed down by 1%. This is done by timesing 24fps by 99.9% which equals to 23.976fps. Simple maths then makes us realise that you need 4 sets of 23.976fps to fit into 5 frames of 29.97.
- Secondly, you convert this fraction into a 3:2 Pulldown. Imagine the film strip is set as four letters: A, B, C and D. First of all A would be split into 3 with it being in the upper field, lower field then upper field again. Then B would be split into 2, one being on the lower field then the upper field. C would then follow what A did and fill up 3 fields but this time it would be lower, upper and lower. And then D would then fill the next two, this then replicates the 3:2 pulldown I mentioned. This is not perfect however as the screen would cause telecine judders every 3 frames.
- Finaly, to counteract this effect we would have to use the reverse telecine. This a technology that worked backwards to construct a true 23.976fps into a 60i video stream.
How do modern Digital Cameras avoid the telecine progress and with what affect?
Modern digital cameras avoid the telecine progress altogether by recording 23.976fps directly on the hard drives, this was effective as you did not have to go down the 3:2 pull down method.
How are 24fps films telecine’d onto SECAM or PAL 25fps?
This process is much simpler than the 3:2 pulldown method as all you have to do is use a 2:2 pulldown. This means that you have to do is times the 24fps by 4% this results in the frames being translated onto an upper and a lower field. However the increase raises the pitch of the audio by a noticeable 0.679 semitones, this can be counteracted by a pitch shifter.
Explain High Frame rates and temporal resolution?
What are the issues with higher frame rates in narrative filmmaking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYjFEp9Yx0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)